HON vs. PH: Honeywell vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison
How do Honeywell (HON) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Honeywell (HON) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but HON is classified in Industrial Conglomerates while PH is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Honeywell International Inc. | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 69.74 billion USD | 115.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 14.14% | 14.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.90% | 33.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 2.32% | 25.35% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.11% | 27.33% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -25.21% | -28.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.82M | 627.57K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.52 | 0.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Honeywell (HON) at 44.39% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% also sits in the top quartile.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
44.39%
- HON
- 44.39%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Honeywell (HON) at 18.68% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
18.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HON
- 18.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Honeywell (HON) at 16.92%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
16.92%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- HON
- 16.92%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 44.39% | 24.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.13% | 8.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 18.68% | 16.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.92% | 21.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 37.21% | 37.70% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Honeywell (HON) at 7.85% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Honeywell (HON) at -8.27% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.85% | 8.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 1.82% | 4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -8.27% | 5.01% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.20% | 21.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Honeywell (HON) at 0.96 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.96
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- HON
- 0.96
- Min
- 0.36
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Honeywell (HON) at 0.76 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.76
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- HON
- 0.76
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.76 | 1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.23 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pays an industry-typical yield; Honeywell (HON) at 3.63% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.63%
- HON
- 3.63%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Honeywell (HON) at 38.87% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
38.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HON
- 38.87%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.63% | 0.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 38.87% | 26.11% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 10.91 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for HON, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
10.91
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- HON
- 10.91
- Min
- 3.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 1.85 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
1.85
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- HON
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Honeywell (HON) at 3.12 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.12
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- HON
- 3.12
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HON | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.91 | 31.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.85 | 5.16 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.12 | 7.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.07% | 2.45% |