HDB vs. MTB: HDFC Bank vs. M&T Bank Stock Comparison

Company Profile

HDFC Bank (HDB) and M&T Bank (MTB) both belong to the Banks industry, though HDB is classified under Diversified Banks while MTB falls under Regional Banks.

M&T Bank (MTB) trades as ordinary local shares, while HDFC Bank (HDB) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both HDFC Bank (HDB) at 11.01% and M&T Bank (MTB) at 10.60% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.87% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while HDFC Bank (HDB) at 26.53% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for HDFC Bank (HDB) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both HDFC Bank (HDB) at 5.23% and M&T Bank (MTB) at 4.34% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Only one side can be read here: M&T Bank (MTB) reports EPS growth of 16.12%, ranked against its industry; HDFC Bank (HDB) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: HDFC Bank (HDB) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: HDFC Bank (HDB) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

M&T Bank (MTB) at 2.73% pays an industry-typical yield; HDFC Bank (HDB) at 52.63% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both HDFC Bank (HDB) at 23.43% and M&T Bank (MTB) at 31.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

M&T Bank (MTB) at 11.38 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while HDFC Bank (HDB) at 16.22 sits in the richer quartile — HDB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

P/S ratio is set aside for both HDFC Bank (HDB) in Banks and M&T Bank (MTB) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

M&T Bank (MTB) at 1.24 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while HDFC Bank (HDB) at 10.01 prices above its benchmark range — HDB looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics