Seek Returns logo

HAS vs. RL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at HAS and RL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolHASRL
Company NameHasbro, Inc.Ralph Lauren Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryLeisure ProductsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization10.60 billion USD19.93 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 12, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of HAS and RL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

HAS vs. RL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolHASRL
5-Day Price Return0.53%2.06%
13-Week Price Return-1.45%13.24%
26-Week Price Return37.42%66.27%
52-Week Price Return4.25%68.26%
Month-to-Date Return-0.37%4.93%
Year-to-Date Return35.16%42.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.77M0.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M0.66M
3-Month Volatility20.70%28.36%
Beta0.561.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.33%
Q3
18.49%
Median
14.83%
Q1
2.57%
Min
-8.74%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

RL

31.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 31.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
10.59%
Q3
10.12%
Median
7.76%
Q1
1.39%
Min
-4.77%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

RL

10.91%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
14.69%
Q3
14.18%
Median
12.19%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-8.06%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

RL

13.69%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.69% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolHASRL
Return on Equity (TTM)-58.96%31.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)-9.17%11.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.37%10.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.06%13.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.02%69.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
3.41
Median
2.38
Q1
1.76
Min
1.04

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RL

1.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.10
Median
0.25
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RL

0.75

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
30.53
Median
16.20
Q1
5.29
Min
-0.46

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolHASRL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.84
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)13.770.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.3485.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

HAS vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

HAS vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

HAS

3.68%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
3.53%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.68%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RL

1.03%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
93.27%
Median
76.96%
Q1
47.15%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RL

25.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolHASRL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.68%1.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)63.63%25.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.88
Q3
36.36
Median
24.51
Q1
18.86
Min
9.55

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

RL

25.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

RL’s P/E Ratio of 25.00 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

HAS

2.50

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.49
Median
1.68
Q1
1.11
Min
0.48

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.50 is in the upper echelon for the Leisure Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RL

2.73

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
5.29
Q3
4.74
Median
3.12
Q1
2.19
Min
1.17

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RL

6.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

RL’s P/B Ratio of 6.61 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Leisure Products and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolHASRL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--25.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.502.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)42.906.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.2419.50