HAL vs. WDS: Halliburton vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do Halliburton (HAL) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Halliburton (HAL) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both fall under the Energy industry group, but HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while WDS is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
Halliburton (HAL) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Halliburton Company | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 26.34 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 18.66% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.16% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 7.11% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Halliburton (HAL) is heavily traded at around 10.27M shares per day, whereas Woodside Energy (WDS) sees a more moderate 570.04K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.27% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.01% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 10.27M | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.64 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 18.78% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.23% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.90% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.43% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -3.31% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.01% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -47.00% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.83% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.02 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.73 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.54 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.13% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 28.57% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HAL | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 13.38 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.37 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.20% | 1.41% |