GWW vs. PH: W.W. Grainger vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison
How do W.W. Grainger (GWW) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
W.W. Grainger (GWW) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GWW is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors while PH is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Name | W.W. Grainger Inc. | Parker-Hannifin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Trading Companies & Distributors | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Trading Companies & Distributors | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 67.45 billion USD | 115.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 54.07% | 14.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 24.16% | 33.71% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.95% | 25.35% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 24.49% | 27.33% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -24.50% | -28.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 250.35K | 627.57K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.03 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.31 | 0.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 52.33% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% also sits in the top quartile.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
52.33%
- GWW
- 52.33%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
24.95%
- Max
- 40.55%
- PH
- 24.95%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 11.17%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
11.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- GWW
- 11.17%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
16.62%
- Max
- 27.47%
- PH
- 16.62%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 16.14%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
16.14%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- GWW
- 16.14%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
21.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- PH
- 21.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 52.33% | 24.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 20.34% | 8.56% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.17% | 16.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.14% | 21.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 39.43% | 37.70% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 4.51% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at -8.55% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.51% | 8.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.62% | 4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -8.55% | 5.01% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.60% | 21.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PH.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
2.61
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GWW
- 2.61
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PH
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- GWW
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PH
Capital Goods industry group
1.09
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PH
- 1.09
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.61 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.65 | 1.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.69 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- GWW
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
0.85%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- PH
- 0.85%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 20.87% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
20.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- GWW
- 20.87%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PH
Capital Goods industry group
26.11%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- PH
- 26.11%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 20.87% | 26.11% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 31.66 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- GWW
- 31.66
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
31.53
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- PH
- 31.53
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 3.48 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
3.48
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- GWW
- 3.48
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PH
Capital Goods industry group
5.16
- Max
- 7.54
- PH
- 5.16
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 15.56 prices even higher, above its industry range.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
15.56
- GWW
- 15.56
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PH
Capital Goods industry group
7.25
- Max
- 9.66
- PH
- 7.25
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GWW | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 31.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.48 | 5.16 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 15.56 | 7.25 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.97% | 2.45% |