GWW vs. LMT: W.W. Grainger vs. Lockheed Martin Stock Comparison
How do W.W. Grainger (GWW) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
W.W. Grainger (GWW) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GWW is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors while LMT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | W.W. Grainger Inc. | Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Trading Companies & Distributors | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Trading Companies & Distributors | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 67.45 billion USD | 131.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 54.07% | 31.17% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 24.16% | 12.79% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.95% | 14.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 24.49% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -24.50% | -31.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 250.35K | 1.29M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.03 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.31 | 1.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 52.33% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 80.19% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
52.33%
- GWW
- 52.33%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
80.19%
- LMT
- 80.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 11.17% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 8.23% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
11.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- GWW
- 11.17%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
8.23%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LMT
- 8.23%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 16.14% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 11.41% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
16.14%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- GWW
- 16.14%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
11.41%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LMT
- 11.41%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 52.33% | 80.19% |
| ROA (TTM) | 20.34% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.17% | 8.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 16.14% | 11.41% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 39.43% | 11.73% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 4.51% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 5.64% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at -8.55% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at -3.68% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.51% | 5.64% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.62% | 4.38% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -8.55% | -3.68% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 5.60% | -0.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.26 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LMT.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
2.61
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GWW
- 2.61
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.26
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LMT
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.04 uses more debt funding than most peers.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- GWW
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.04
- Max
- 2.33
- LMT
- 2.04
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.61 | 1.26 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.65 | 2.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.69 | 1.47 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.40% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LMT the richer one.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- GWW
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LMT
- 2.40%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 20.87% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 49.01% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
20.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- GWW
- 20.87%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
49.01%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LMT
- 49.01%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 2.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 20.87% | 49.01% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 31.66 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 20.14 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- GWW
- 31.66
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
20.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LMT
- 20.14
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 3.48 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.66 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
3.48
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- GWW
- 3.48
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LMT
- 1.66
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 15.56 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 12.96 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
15.56
- GWW
- 15.56
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
12.96
- LMT
- 12.96
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GWW | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 31.66 | 20.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.48 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 15.56 | 12.96 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.97% | 4.31% |