GPN vs. SCHW: Global Payments vs. Charles Schwab Stock Comparison
How do Global Payments (GPN) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Global Payments (GPN) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while SCHW is classified in Capital Markets.
| Profile Item | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Global Payments Inc. | The Charles Schwab Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Transaction & Payment Processing Services | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 25.78 billion USD | 158.22 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 16, 2001 | September 22, 1987 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 31.53% | -0.80% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -1.66% | 21.35% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -4.82% | 4.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.00% | 26.01% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.74 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.06% | -49.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.69M | 8.22M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.65 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.10 | -0.26 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.12% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
0.84%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- GPN
- 0.84%
- Min
- -18.71%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
21.12%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- SCHW
- 21.12%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Charles Schwab (SCHW) reports 39.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
-11.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- GPN
- -11.21%
- Min
- -28.52%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
39.33%
- Max
- 62.84%
- SCHW
- 39.33%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 52.67% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
15.73%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- GPN
- 15.73%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
52.67%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- SCHW
- 52.67%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 0.84% | 21.12% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.24% | 2.16% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -11.21% | 39.33% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 15.73% | 52.67% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 22.01% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 55.52% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SCHW.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.39% | 22.01% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.96% | 4.83% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -6.17% | 55.52% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 143.57% | 9.93% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 1.33% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.05%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- GPN
- 1.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
1.33%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- SCHW
- 1.33%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Charles Schwab (SCHW) reports 21.03%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
178.57%
- Max
- 241.07%
- GPN
- 178.57%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
21.03%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- SCHW
- 21.03%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.05% | 1.33% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 178.57% | 21.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 15.64 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
173.93
- GPN
- 173.93
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
15.64
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- SCHW
- 15.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 5.85 sits in the pricier quartile — SCHW costs more per dollar of sales.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
2.24
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- GPN
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
5.85
- Max
- 9.23
- SCHW
- 5.85
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 3.08 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.11
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- GPN
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
SCHW
Financial Services industry group
3.08
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- SCHW
- 3.08
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GPN | SCHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 173.93 | 15.64 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.24 | 5.85 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.11 | 3.08 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |