GPN vs. RJF: Global Payments vs. Raymond James Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Global Payments (GPN) and Raymond James Financial (RJF) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while RJF is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 18.73% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Raymond James Financial (RJF) reports 14.97%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 20.88% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Global Payments (GPN) reports revenue growth of -0.39%, ranked against its industry; Raymond James Financial (RJF) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Both Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 15.63% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Raymond James Financial (RJF) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Raymond James Financial (RJF) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Raymond James Financial (RJF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports a yield of 1.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Raymond James Financial (RJF) reports 18.48%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 13.67 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.

On P/S ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 1.98 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Raymond James Financial (RJF) at 2.46 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics