GPN vs. OWL: Global Payments vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Global Payments (GPN) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while OWL is classified in Capital Markets.

Global Payments (GPN) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 16, 2001, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) listed on December 14, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 6.41% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports 3.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 31.15% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 9.66% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OWL the richer one.

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 178.57% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 650.00% report payout ratio above 100%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings on both sides.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 70.14 trade above their industries’ P/E ratio peer ranges, pointing to unusually expensive trailing earnings relative to peers.

Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 sits in the pricier quartile — OWL costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics