Seek Returns

GPN vs. NDAQ: Global Payments vs. Nasdaq Stock Comparison

How do Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while NDAQ is classified in Capital Markets.

Company profile comparison for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
Profile ItemGPNNDAQ
NameGlobal Payments Inc.Nasdaq, Inc. Common Stock
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryTransaction & Payment Processing ServicesFinancial Exchanges & Data
Market Capitalization25.78 billion USD59.88 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001July 1, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GPN
NDAQ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
Total Return (1Y)31.53%26.55%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-1.66%30.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-4.82%10.68%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GPN
NDAQ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.00%28.74%
Beta (5Y)0.800.94
Max Drawdown (5Y)-57.06%-32.57%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.69M3.13M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
GPN and NDAQ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.650.77
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.101.09

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 17.33% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

0.84%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
GPN
0.84%
Min
-18.71%

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

17.33%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
NDAQ
17.33%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Nasdaq (NDAQ) reports 36.06%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

-11.21%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
GPN
-11.21%
Min
-28.52%

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

36.06%

Max
62.84%
NDAQ
36.06%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 50.57% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

15.73%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
GPN
15.73%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

50.57%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
NDAQ
50.57%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
ROE (TTM)0.84%17.33%
ROA (TTM)2.24%6.10%
Net Margin (TTM)-11.21%36.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)15.73%50.57%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 11.65% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 60.10% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NDAQ.

Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.39%11.65%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-4.96%9.89%
EPS Growth (YoY)-6.17%60.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)143.57%10.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Nasdaq (NDAQ) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Nasdaq (NDAQ) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% and Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 1.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

1.05%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
GPN
1.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

1.09%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
NDAQ
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nasdaq (NDAQ) reports 31.69%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

178.57%

Max
241.07%
GPN
178.57%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

31.69%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
NDAQ
31.69%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.05%1.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)178.57%31.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 29.27 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 is richer still, above its industry range.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

173.93

GPN
173.93
Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

29.27

Max
45.85
NDAQ
29.27
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 10.36 clears its benchmark range — NDAQ looks notably rich on sales.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

2.24

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
GPN
2.24
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

10.36

NDAQ
10.36
Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Nasdaq (NDAQ) at 4.99 carries an above-peer premium to book — NDAQ is pricier on assets.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

1.11

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
GPN
1.11
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

NDAQ

Financial Services industry group

4.99

Max
7.79
NDAQ
4.99
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Nasdaq (NDAQ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Nasdaq (NDAQ)
MetricGPNNDAQ
P/E Ratio (TTM)173.9329.27
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.2410.36
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.114.99
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----