GPN vs. ICE: Global Payments vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison
How do Global Payments (GPN) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Global Payments (GPN) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while ICE is classified in Capital Markets.
| Profile Item | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Global Payments Inc. | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Transaction & Payment Processing Services | Financial Exchanges & Data |
| Market Capitalization | 25.78 billion USD | 96.27 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 16, 2001 | November 16, 2005 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 31.53% | 18.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -1.66% | 18.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -4.82% | 6.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.00% | 25.87% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.06% | -33.97% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.69M | 3.09M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.10 | 0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
0.84%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- GPN
- 0.84%
- Min
- -18.71%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports 38.14%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
-11.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- GPN
- -11.21%
- Min
- -28.52%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
15.73%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- GPN
- 15.73%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 0.84% | 14.40% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.24% | 2.28% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -11.21% | 38.14% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 15.73% | 52.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.39% | 7.47% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -4.96% | 9.47% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -6.17% | 20.71% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 143.57% | 30.77% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.05%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- GPN
- 1.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports 27.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
178.57%
- Max
- 241.07%
- GPN
- 178.57%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.05% | 1.17% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 178.57% | 27.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
173.93
- GPN
- 173.93
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the pricier quartile — ICE costs more per dollar of sales.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
2.24
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- GPN
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.11
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- GPN
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GPN | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 173.93 | 23.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.24 | 8.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.11 | 3.22 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |