GPN vs. HOOD: Global Payments vs. Robinhood Markets Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Global Payments (GPN) and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while HOOD is classified in Capital Markets.

Global Payments (GPN) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 16, 2001, whereas Robinhood Markets (HOOD) listed on July 29, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Global Payments (GPN) is closer to market-like at 0.80 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Robinhood Markets (HOOD) reports 39.04%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Both Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports a yield of 1.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 is richer still, above its industry range.

Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 clears its benchmark range — HOOD looks notably rich on sales.

Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — HOOD is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics