Seek Returns

GPN vs. GS: Global Payments vs. Goldman Sachs Stock Comparison

How do Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but GPN is classified in Financial Services while GS is classified in Capital Markets.

Company profile comparison for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
Profile ItemGPNGS
NameGlobal Payments Inc.The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryTransaction & Payment Processing ServicesInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization25.78 billion USD249.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 16, 2001May 4, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

GPN
GS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
Total Return (1Y)31.53%17.85%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-1.66%44.69%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-4.82%20.41%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

GPN
GS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.00%33.28%
Beta (5Y)0.801.27
Max Drawdown (5Y)-57.06%-30.90%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.69M2.10M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
GPN and GS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.650.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.100.59

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

0.84%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
GPN
0.84%
Min
-18.71%

GS

Financial Services industry group

17.71%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
GS
17.71%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports 31.21%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

-11.21%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
GPN
-11.21%
Min
-28.52%

GS

Financial Services industry group

31.21%

Max
62.84%
GS
31.21%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

15.73%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
GPN
15.73%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

GS

Financial Services industry group

38.37%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
GS
38.37%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
ROE (TTM)0.84%17.71%
ROA (TTM)2.24%1.11%
Net Margin (TTM)-11.21%31.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)15.73%38.37%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.39%8.92%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-4.96%7.16%
EPS Growth (YoY)-6.17%26.59%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)143.57%19.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

1.05%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
GPN
1.05%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GS

Financial Services industry group

2.07%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
GS
2.07%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports 25.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

178.57%

Max
241.07%
GPN
178.57%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GS

Financial Services industry group

25.88%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
GS
25.88%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.05%2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)178.57%25.88%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

173.93

GPN
173.93
Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

GS

Financial Services industry group

12.45

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
GS
12.45
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

2.24

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
GPN
2.24
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

GS

Financial Services industry group

3.52

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
GS
3.52
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

GPN

Financial Services industry group

1.11

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
GPN
1.11
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

GS

Financial Services industry group

2.36

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
GS
2.36
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Global Payments (GPN) vs. Goldman Sachs (GS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Global Payments (GPN) and Goldman Sachs (GS)
MetricGPNGS
P/E Ratio (TTM)173.9312.45
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.243.52
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.112.36
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----