GLW vs. IONQ: Corning vs. IonQ Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Corning (GLW) and IonQ (IONQ) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but GLW is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Corning (GLW) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 31, 1981, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Corning (GLW) is closer to market-like at 1.25 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Corning (GLW) at 17.88% and IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Corning (GLW) at 12.13% also retains a top-quartile share.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Corning (GLW) reports 18.95%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Corning (GLW) at 19.14%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Only one side can be read here: Corning (GLW) reports EPS growth of 215.52%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Corning (GLW) at 1.72 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Corning (GLW) at 0.64 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Corning (GLW) reports a yield of 1.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Corning (GLW) reports a payout of 45.34%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Corning (GLW) at 42.97 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Corning (GLW) at 5.16 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 clears its benchmark range — IONQ looks notably rich on sales.

IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Corning (GLW) at 7.03 carries an above-peer premium to book — GLW is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics