GIS vs. MNST: General Mills vs. Monster Beverage Stock Comparison

Company Profile

General Mills (GIS) and Monster Beverage (MNST) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but GIS is classified in Food Products while MNST is classified in Beverages.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative beta of -0.01, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Monster Beverage (MNST) has a non-negative beta of 0.52.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative ROE of -10.50%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Monster Beverage (MNST) reports 24.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative net margin of -4.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Monster Beverage (MNST) reports 22.66%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 28.06% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of General Mills (GIS) at 15.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 10.70% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while General Mills (GIS) at -5.45% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 19.75% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while General Mills (GIS) at -103.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Monster Beverage (MNST) at 3.82 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while General Mills (GIS) at 0.70 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: General Mills (GIS) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.82 against its industry range, while Monster Beverage (MNST) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile General Mills (GIS) reports a yield of 6.69%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Monster Beverage (MNST) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile General Mills (GIS) reports a payout of 59.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at 41.56 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while General Mills (GIS) has no P/E ratio this period.

General Mills (GIS) at 1.04 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.34 clears its benchmark range — MNST looks notably rich on sales.

General Mills (GIS) at 2.55 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Monster Beverage (MNST) at 9.09 prices above its benchmark range — MNST looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics