GFI vs. MT: Gold Fields vs. ArcelorMittal Stock Comparison
How do Gold Fields (GFI) and ArcelorMittal (MT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Gold Fields (GFI) and ArcelorMittal (MT) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though GFI is classified under Gold while MT falls under Steel.
Both Gold Fields (GFI) and ArcelorMittal (MT) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.
| Profile Item | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Gold Fields Ltd. Sponsored ADR | ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares |
| Country/Region | South Africa | Luxembourg |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 34.65 billion USD | 45.85 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | August 7, 1997 |
| Security Type | ADR | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 9.54% | 65.49% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 51.07% | 45.03% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 38.08% | 16.55% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
ArcelorMittal (MT) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Gold Fields (GFI) is defensive at 0.64 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 60.41% | 44.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 1.49 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.22% | -45.99% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.78M | 1.35M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | 1.39 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.12 | 2.23 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 58.68% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
GFI
Materials industry group
58.68%
- GFI
- 58.68%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
MT
Materials industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MT
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 38.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
GFI
Materials industry group
38.66%
- GFI
- 38.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
MT
Materials industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- MT
- 1.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 55.00% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
GFI
Materials industry group
55.00%
- Max
- 66.70%
- GFI
- 55.00%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
MT
Materials industry group
6.16%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- MT
- 6.16%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 58.68% | 1.83% |
| ROA (TTM) | 28.52% | 1.31% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.66% | 1.64% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 55.00% | 6.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 57.77% | 8.16% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Gold Fields (GFI) at 68.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 185.51% and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.24% | -1.74% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 26.86% | -8.41% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 185.51% | 143.20% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 71.58% | -26.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 1.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MT.
GFI
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- GFI
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
MT
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- MT
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 0.29 and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
GFI
Materials industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- GFI
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
MT
Materials industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- MT
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.87 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.06 | 2.08 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% pays an industry-typical yield; Gold Fields (GFI) at 5.65% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
GFI
Materials industry group
5.65%
- GFI
- 5.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MT
Materials industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MT
- 0.99%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 31.81% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
GFI
Materials industry group
31.81%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- GFI
- 31.81%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MT
Materials industry group
52.92%
- Max
- 83.62%
- MT
- 52.92%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.65% | 0.99% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.81% | 52.92% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 8.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
GFI
Materials industry group
8.03
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- GFI
- 8.03
- Min
- 3.93
MT
Materials industry group
44.51
- Max
- 59.00
- MT
- 44.51
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Gold Fields (GFI) at 3.05 prices around its industry’s middle — MT costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
GFI
Materials industry group
3.05
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- GFI
- 3.05
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
MT
Materials industry group
0.72
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- MT
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Gold Fields (GFI) at 7.78 prices above its benchmark range — GFI looks rich relative to book.
GFI
Materials industry group
7.78
- GFI
- 7.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
MT
Materials industry group
1.70
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- MT
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GFI | MT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.03 | 44.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.05 | 0.72 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.78 | 1.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.05% | -1.75% |