GFI vs. IAG: Gold Fields vs. IAMGOLD Stock Comparison
How do Gold Fields (GFI) and IAMGOLD (IAG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Gold Fields (GFI) and IAMGOLD (IAG) are both classified in the Gold sub-industry within the broader Metals & Mining industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
IAMGOLD (IAG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Gold Fields (GFI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Gold Fields Ltd. Sponsored ADR | IAMGOLD Corporation |
| Country/Region | South Africa | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 34.65 billion USD | 10.63 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | July 15, 2003 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 9.54% | 53.79% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 51.07% | 103.91% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 38.08% | 44.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
IAMGOLD (IAG) has an aggressive beta of 1.33, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Gold Fields (GFI) is defensive at 0.64 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 60.41% | 64.39% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 1.33 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.22% | -73.58% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.78M | 5.11M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | 0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.12 | 1.17 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Gold Fields (GFI) at 58.68% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.91% also sits in the top quartile.
GFI
Materials industry group
58.68%
- GFI
- 58.68%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
IAG
Materials industry group
34.91%
- Max
- 52.88%
- IAG
- 34.91%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Gold Fields (GFI) at 38.66% and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 34.29% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
GFI
Materials industry group
38.66%
- GFI
- 38.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
IAG
Materials industry group
34.29%
- Max
- 38.66%
- IAG
- 34.29%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 55.00% and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 43.99% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
GFI
Materials industry group
55.00%
- Max
- 66.70%
- GFI
- 55.00%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
IAG
Materials industry group
43.99%
- Max
- 66.70%
- IAG
- 43.99%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 58.68% | 34.91% |
| ROA (TTM) | 28.52% | 20.39% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 38.66% | 34.29% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 55.00% | 43.99% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 57.77% | 51.82% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 68.24% and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 74.70% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Gold Fields (GFI) at 185.51% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while IAMGOLD (IAG) at -24.00% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for GFI.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.24% | 74.70% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 26.86% | 43.83% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 185.51% | -24.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 71.58% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 1.87 and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.41 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
GFI
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- GFI
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
IAG
Materials industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- IAG
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 0.12 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Gold Fields (GFI) at 0.29 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
GFI
Materials industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- GFI
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
IAG
Materials industry group
0.12
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- IAG
- 0.12
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.87 | 2.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.06 | -0.10 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Gold Fields (GFI) reports a yield of 5.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GFI
Materials industry group
5.65%
- GFI
- 5.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IAG
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- IAG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
IAMGOLD (IAG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Gold Fields (GFI) reports a payout of 31.81%, ranking against industry peers normally.
GFI
Materials industry group
31.81%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- GFI
- 31.81%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IAG
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- IAG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.65% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.81% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Gold Fields (GFI) at 8.03 and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 8.34 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.
GFI
Materials industry group
8.03
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- GFI
- 8.03
- Min
- 3.93
IAG
Materials industry group
8.34
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- IAG
- 8.34
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Gold Fields (GFI) at 3.05 and IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.77 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
GFI
Materials industry group
3.05
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- GFI
- 3.05
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
IAG
Materials industry group
2.77
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- IAG
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
IAMGOLD (IAG) at 2.30 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Gold Fields (GFI) at 7.78 prices above its benchmark range — GFI looks rich relative to book.
GFI
Materials industry group
7.78
- GFI
- 7.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
IAG
Materials industry group
2.30
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- IAG
- 2.30
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GFI | IAG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.03 | 8.34 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.05 | 2.77 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.78 | 2.30 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.05% | 11.69% |