GEV vs. NOC: GE Vernova vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison

Company Profile

GE Vernova (GEV) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GEV is classified in Electrical Equipment while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) carries decades of public-market history since December 31, 1981, while GE Vernova (GEV) listed on March 27, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the NOC side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. GE Vernova (GEV) has a non-negative beta of 0.96.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both companies show strong equity returns, but GE Vernova (GEV) at 82.58% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.96% also sits in the top quartile.

GE Vernova (GEV) at 23.04% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.48%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 7.47% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 11.60% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 8.97% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

GE Vernova (GEV) at 217.03% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 0.85 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.17 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both GE Vernova (GEV) at 0.28 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.95 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.81% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while GE Vernova (GEV) at 0.19% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NOC the richer one.

GE Vernova (GEV) at 5.73% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 29.88% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.50 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while GE Vernova (GEV) at 27.48 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.72 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while GE Vernova (GEV) at 6.16 sits in the pricier quartile — GEV costs more per dollar of sales.

Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 4.12 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while GE Vernova (GEV) at 21.32 prices above its benchmark range — GEV looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics