GD vs. MAIR: General Dynamics vs. Madison Air Stock Comparison

Company Profile

General Dynamics (GD) and Madison Air (MAIR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but GD is classified in Aerospace & Defense while MAIR is classified in Building Products.

General Dynamics (GD) has been public since January 2, 1962, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Madison Air (MAIR) listed only on April 16, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Madison Air (MAIR) has an aggressive beta of 1.60, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while General Dynamics (GD) is defensive at 0.30 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both GD and MAIR need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: General Dynamics (GD) earns 18.01% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Madison Air (MAIR) has no ROE this period.

Both General Dynamics (GD) at 8.24% and Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.73% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Madison Air (MAIR) at 19.76% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of General Dynamics (GD) at 10.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Madison Air (MAIR) at 34.07% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while General Dynamics (GD) at 10.13% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MAIR.

Both General Dynamics (GD) at 13.35% and Madison Air (MAIR) at -2.32% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Madison Air (MAIR) at 1.82 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while General Dynamics (GD) at 1.43 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for GD.

Both General Dynamics (GD) at 0.33 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 0.87 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile General Dynamics (GD) reports a yield of 1.76%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile General Dynamics (GD) reports a payout of 36.90%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

General Dynamics (GD) at 20.84 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Madison Air (MAIR) at 164.57 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for MAIR’s trailing earnings.

On P/S ratio, both General Dynamics (GD) at 1.69 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.09 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

On P/B ratio, both General Dynamics (GD) at 3.50 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.17 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics