FUTU vs. ICE: Futu vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison
How do Futu (FUTU) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Futu (FUTU) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though FUTU is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while ICE falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Futu Holdings Ltd. ADR | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Hong Kong | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Financial Exchanges & Data |
| Market Capitalization | 13.75 billion USD | 96.27 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 8, 2019 | November 16, 2005 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -45.15% | 18.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 22.02% | 18.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 13.70% | 6.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 59.94% | 25.87% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -60.17% | -33.97% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.18M | 3.09M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.82 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.10 | 0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FUTU.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
30.52%
- Max
- 44.78%
- FUTU
- 30.52%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
46.20%
- Max
- 62.84%
- FUTU
- 46.20%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
66.75%
- Max
- 107.33%
- FUTU
- 66.75%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.52% | 14.40% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.51% | 2.28% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 46.20% | 38.14% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 66.75% | 52.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.11% | 7.47% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 44.24% | 9.47% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 106.38% | 20.71% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 58.06% | 30.77% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports a yield of 1.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- FUTU
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
25.80%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- FUTU
- 25.80%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.80% | 27.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
9.73
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- FUTU
- 9.73
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
0.57
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- FUTU
- 0.57
- Min
- -0.55
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
2.75
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- FUTU
- 2.75
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 9.73 | 23.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 8.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.75 | 3.22 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |