FUTU vs. HOOD: Futu vs. Robinhood Markets Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Futu (FUTU) and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) has a highly aggressive beta of 2.52, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 21.45% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FUTU.

For every dollar of sales, both Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 39.04% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 48.10%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 51.58% also sits in the top quartile.

Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 31.41% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Robinhood Markets (HOOD) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Futu (FUTU) nor Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Robinhood Markets (HOOD) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Futu (FUTU) reports a payout of 25.80%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 37.29 sits in the richer quartile — HOOD needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 14.34 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Robinhood Markets (HOOD) at 7.29 carries an above-peer premium to book — HOOD is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics