FUTU vs. HLI: Futu vs. Houlihan Lokey Stock Comparison
How do Futu (FUTU) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Futu (FUTU) and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) are both classified in the Investment Banking & Brokerage sub-industry within the broader Capital Markets industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Houlihan Lokey (HLI) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Futu Holdings Ltd. ADR | Houlihan Lokey, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Hong Kong | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 13.75 billion USD | 10.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 8, 2019 | August 13, 2015 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -45.15% | -16.23% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 22.02% | 15.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 13.70% | 6.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 59.94% | 31.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.87 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -60.17% | -40.30% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.18M | 816.85K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.82 | -0.66 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.10 | -0.91 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 17.29% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FUTU.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
30.52%
- Max
- 44.78%
- FUTU
- 30.52%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
HLI
Financial Services industry group
17.29%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- HLI
- 17.29%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 15.80%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
46.20%
- Max
- 62.84%
- FUTU
- 46.20%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
HLI
Financial Services industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- HLI
- 15.80%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 24.42%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
66.75%
- Max
- 107.33%
- FUTU
- 66.75%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
HLI
Financial Services industry group
24.42%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- HLI
- 24.42%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.52% | 17.29% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.51% | 10.38% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 46.20% | 15.80% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 66.75% | 24.42% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 9.55%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 6.87% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 68.11% | 9.55% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 44.24% | 13.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 106.38% | 6.87% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 58.06% | 16.05% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Houlihan Lokey (HLI) reports a yield of 1.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- FUTU
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HLI
Financial Services industry group
1.77%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- HLI
- 1.77%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 43.62% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
25.80%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- FUTU
- 25.80%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HLI
Financial Services industry group
43.62%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- HLI
- 43.62%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.77% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.80% | 43.62% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 and Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 24.47 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
9.73
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- FUTU
- 9.73
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
HLI
Financial Services industry group
24.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- HLI
- 24.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 3.96 prices around its industry’s middle — FUTU costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
0.57
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- FUTU
- 0.57
- Min
- -0.55
HLI
Financial Services industry group
3.96
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- HLI
- 3.96
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Houlihan Lokey (HLI) at 4.39 carries an above-peer premium to book — HLI is pricier on assets.
FUTU
Financial Services industry group
2.75
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- FUTU
- 2.75
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
HLI
Financial Services industry group
4.39
- Max
- 7.79
- HLI
- 4.39
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FUTU | HLI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 9.73 | 24.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.57 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.75 | 4.39 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |