FTV vs. PH: Fortive vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile Item	FTV	PH
Name	Fortive Corporation	Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Machinery	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	19.46 billion USD	115.73 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 5, 2016	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FTV

GSPC

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
Total Return (1Y)	31.85%	14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	11.44%	33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	3.01%	25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FTV

GSPC

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.76%	27.33%
Beta (5Y)	1.01	1.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-32.10%	-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.44M	627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FTV and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.99	0.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.51	0.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Fortive (FTV) at 10.55% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

10.55%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FTV: 10.55%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max: 40.55%
PH: 24.95%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Fortive (FTV) at 14.83% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

14.83%

Max: 27.47%
FTV: 14.83%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max: 27.47%
PH: 16.62%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 21.30% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

21.30%

Max: 36.60%
FTV: 21.30%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max: 36.60%
PH: 21.90%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
ROE (TTM)	10.55%	24.95%
ROA (TTM)	4.61%	8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)	14.83%	16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)	21.30%	21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)	63.47%	37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Fortive (FTV) at 1.92% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Fortive (FTV) at -26.69% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
Revenue Growth (YoY)	1.92%	8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-10.62%	4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-26.69%	5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-6.26%	21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 1.23 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

1.23

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FTV: 1.23
Min: 0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
PH: 0.94
Min: 0.36

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 0.60 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

0.60

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
FTV: 0.60
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
PH: 1.09
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.23	0.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.60	1.09
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.45	2.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 0.38% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

0.38%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FTV: 0.38%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
PH: 0.85%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 11.85% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

11.85%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
FTV: 11.85%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
PH: 26.11%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.38%	0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	11.85%	26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 30.98 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

30.98

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
FTV: 30.98
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
PH: 31.53
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Fortive (FTV) at 4.43 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

4.43

Max: 7.54
FTV: 4.43
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max: 7.54
PH: 5.16
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Fortive (FTV) at 3.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

3.28

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
FTV: 3.28
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max: 9.66
PH: 7.25
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Fortive (FTV) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Fortive (FTV) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	FTV	PH
P/E Ratio (TTM)	30.98	31.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)	4.43	5.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	3.28	7.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.05%	2.45%