FTV vs. NOC: Fortive vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison
How do Fortive (FTV) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Fortive (FTV) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FTV is classified in Machinery while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Fortive Corporation | Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 19.46 billion USD | 74.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 5, 2016 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 31.85% | -3.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.44% | 7.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 3.01% | 9.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Fortive (FTV) has a non-negative beta of 1.01.
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.76% | 28.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | -0.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -32.10% | -37.80% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.44M | 902.47K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.99 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | -0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Fortive (FTV) at 10.55% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for NOC.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
10.55%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FTV
- 10.55%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Fortive (FTV) at 14.83% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
14.83%
- Max
- 27.47%
- FTV
- 14.83%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Fortive (FTV) at 21.30% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
21.30%
- Max
- 36.60%
- FTV
- 21.30%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 10.55% | 26.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.61% | 7.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.83% | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 21.30% | 12.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 63.47% | 20.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Fortive (FTV) at 1.92% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Fortive (FTV) at -26.69% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.92% | 2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -10.62% | 4.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -26.69% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -6.26% | -2.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Fortive (FTV) at 1.23 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FTV
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Fortive (FTV) at 0.60 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
0.60
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FTV
- 0.60
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.23 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.60 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.45 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Fortive (FTV) at 0.38% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NOC the richer one.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
0.38%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FTV
- 0.38%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Fortive (FTV) at 11.85% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
11.85%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- FTV
- 11.85%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.38% | 1.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 11.85% | 30.18% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Fortive (FTV) at 30.98 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
30.98
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FTV
- 30.98
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Fortive (FTV) at 4.43 sits in the pricier quartile — FTV costs more per dollar of sales.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
4.43
- Max
- 7.54
- FTV
- 4.43
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Fortive (FTV) at 3.28 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FTV
Capital Goods industry group
3.28
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FTV
- 3.28
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FTV | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.98 | 16.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.43 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.28 | 3.99 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.05% | 4.21% |