FTI vs. WDS: TechnipFMC vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do TechnipFMC (FTI) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
TechnipFMC (FTI) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both fall under the Energy industry group, but FTI is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while WDS is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
TechnipFMC (FTI) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | TechnipFMC plc | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 24.70 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 15, 2001 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 51.75% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 46.71% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 54.94% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.65% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.71% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.86M | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.45 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.11 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FTI.
FTI
Energy industry group
38.30%
- Max
- 53.85%
- FTI
- 38.30%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FTI
Energy industry group
12.04%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FTI
- 12.04%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
FTI
Energy industry group
17.77%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- FTI
- 17.77%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 38.30% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.08% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.04% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.77% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.60% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 9.35% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.02% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 20.42% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FTI
Energy industry group
1.09
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- FTI
- 1.09
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FTI
Energy industry group
0.39
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- FTI
- 0.39
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.09 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.39 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
FTI
Energy industry group
0.32%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- FTI
- 0.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FTI
Energy industry group
6.29%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- FTI
- 6.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.32% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.29% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
FTI
Energy industry group
19.97
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- FTI
- 19.97
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the pricier quartile — WDS costs more per dollar of sales.
FTI
Energy industry group
2.32
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FTI
- 2.32
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 prices above its benchmark range — FTI looks rich relative to book.
FTI
Energy industry group
7.44
- FTI
- 7.44
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FTI | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.97 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.32 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.44 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.01% | 1.41% |