Seek Returns logo

FTI vs. WDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FTI and WDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

FTI is a standard domestic listing, while WDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolFTIWDS
Company NameTechnipFMC plcWoodside Energy Group Ltd
CountryUnited StatesAustralia
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization15.59 billion USD28.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 15, 2001November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FTI and WDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FTI vs. WDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFTIWDS
5-Day Price Return-1.30%-0.87%
13-Week Price Return7.82%-4.96%
26-Week Price Return28.59%11.65%
52-Week Price Return37.94%-11.38%
Month-to-Date Return-3.88%-0.96%
Year-to-Date Return31.03%-7.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.78M4.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.96M4.82M
3-Month Volatility34.64%22.76%
Beta0.711.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FTI

28.74%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Return on Equity of 28.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WDS

8.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

WDS’s Return on Equity of 8.31% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FTI

9.60%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

FTI’s Net Profit Margin of 9.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WDS

21.42%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.42% places WDS in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FTI

11.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

FTI’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WDS

28.80%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

WDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 28.80% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFTIWDS
Return on Equity (TTM)28.74%8.31%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.19%4.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.60%21.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.97%28.80%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)20.44%39.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

1.10

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

FTI’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WDS

1.90

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

WDS’s Current Ratio of 1.90 is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

0.24

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, FTI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WDS

0.38

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

WDS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FTI

23.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

FTI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WDS

23.23

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

WDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.23 is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFTIWDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.101.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.821.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.240.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.5023.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

FTI vs. WDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FTI vs. WDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FTI

0.55%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WDS

8.10%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 8.10%, WDS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FTI

9.28%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

FTI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.28% is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

WDS

78.46%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

WDS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.46% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFTIWDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%8.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.28%78.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FTI

16.95

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

FTI’s P/E Ratio of 16.95 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WDS

9.68

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

WDS’s P/E Ratio of 9.68 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FTI

1.63

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

FTI’s P/S Ratio of 1.63 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WDS

2.07

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

WDS’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FTI

4.44

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

FTI’s P/B Ratio of 4.44 is in the upper tier for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WDS

0.83

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

WDS’s P/B Ratio of 0.83 is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FTI vs. WDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Energy Equipment & Services and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFTIWDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.959.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.632.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.440.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.7028.72