Seek Returns

FMS vs. GH: Fresenius Medical Care vs. Guardant Health Stock Comparison

How do Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH) are both classified in the Health Care Services sub-industry within the broader Health Care Providers & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Guardant Health (GH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
Profile ItemFMSGH
NameFresenius Medical Care AG - Depositary ReceiptGuardant Health, Inc.
Country/RegionGermanyUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS Industry GroupHealth Care Equipment & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryHealth Care ServicesHealth Care Services
Market Capitalization12.15 billion USD20.41 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1996October 4, 2018
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FMS
GH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
Total Return (1Y)-0.71%66.53%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)13.88%92.76%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-4.69%8.36%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FMS
GH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.61%53.23%
Beta (5Y)0.771.69
Max Drawdown (5Y)-62.33%-85.09%
Avg. Volume (3M)954.21K1.97M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FMS and GH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.161.17
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.211.84

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) earns 7.84% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Guardant Health (GH) has no ROE this period.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

7.84%

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
FMS
7.84%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
GH
--
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): GH does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; FMS is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Guardant Health (GH) reports a negative net margin of -37.93%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports 4.22%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

4.22%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
FMS
4.22%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

-37.93%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%
GH
-37.93%
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their net margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Guardant Health (GH) reports a negative operating margin of -37.06%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports 9.63%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

9.63%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
FMS
9.63%
Median
6.81%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

-37.06%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%
GH
-37.06%
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
ROE (TTM)7.84%--
ROA (TTM)3.94%-19.92%
Net Margin (TTM)4.22%-37.93%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.63%-37.06%
Gross Margin (TTM)26.46%65.19%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Guardant Health (GH) at 32.88% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 1.51% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports EPS growth of 83.61%, ranked against its industry; Guardant Health (GH) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
Revenue Growth (YoY)1.51%32.88%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)0.39%29.75%
EPS Growth (YoY)83.61%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)13.47%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Guardant Health (GH) at 3.60 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.99 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FMS.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.99

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
FMS
0.99
Min
0.30

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

3.60

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
GH
3.60
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.79 against its industry range, while Guardant Health (GH) reports no figure this period.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.79

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
FMS
0.79
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
GH
--
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): GH does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; FMS is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.993.60
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.79--
Net Debt / EBITDA3.63--

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Guardant Health (GH) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports a yield of 6.30%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

6.30%

FMS
6.30%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

GH
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Guardant Health (GH) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports a payout of 50.14%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

50.14%

FMS
50.14%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

GH
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.30%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.14%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) trades at 13.53 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Guardant Health (GH) has no P/E ratio this period.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

13.53

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
FMS
13.53
Min
4.21

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

--

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21
GH
--
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): GH does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; FMS is benchmarked against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) at 0.62 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Guardant Health (GH) at 15.96 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.62

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
Q1
1.10
FMS
0.62
Min
0.03

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

15.96

GH
15.96
Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Guardant Health (GH) reports a negative P/B ratio of -73.67, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) reports 0.85, ranking against industry peers normally.

FMS

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.85

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
FMS
0.85
Min
-1.31

GH

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

-73.67

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
GH
-73.67
Loading chart…
Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) vs. Guardant Health (GH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Fresenius Medical Care (FMS) and Guardant Health (GH)
MetricFMSGH
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.53--
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.6215.96
P/B Ratio (MRQ)0.85-73.67
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.29%-0.30%