Seek Returns logo

FLUT vs. SCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FLUT and SCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFLUTSCI
Company NameFlutter Entertainment plcService Corporation International
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization48.96 billion USD11.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 4, 2002March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FLUT and SCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FLUT vs. SCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFLUTSCI
5-Day Price Return-9.53%2.66%
13-Week Price Return-11.36%2.24%
26-Week Price Return6.38%4.06%
52-Week Price Return6.38%6.19%
Month-to-Date Return-0.62%5.01%
Year-to-Date Return-2.33%4.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.38M1.14M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.45M0.98M
3-Month Volatility32.47%18.56%
Beta1.210.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

SCI

32.84%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.84%
Q3
21.21%
Median
13.32%
Q1
11.02%
Min
0.11%

In the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Return on Equity of 32.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SCI

12.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
13.26%
Median
12.53%
Q1
7.59%
Min
0.13%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SCI

22.39%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.98%
Q3
22.01%
Median
15.97%
Q1
9.54%
Min
0.80%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.39% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFLUTSCI
Return on Equity (TTM)3.70%32.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.40%3.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%12.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.53%22.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.94%26.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SCI

0.61

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
2.31
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.61 falls into the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SCI

3.23

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.64
Median
0.19
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.23, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
54.22
Q3
32.36
Median
10.70
Q1
4.19
Min
1.66

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFLUTSCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.950.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.890.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.973.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.023.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

FLUT vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FLUT vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SCI

1.53%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.95%
Q3
1.55%
Median
0.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Yield of 1.53% is consistent with its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SCI

33.29%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
52.37%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.29% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFLUTSCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

123.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.10, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SCI

21.70

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
38.85
Q3
31.29
Median
22.33
Q1
15.56
Min
7.57

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 21.70 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SCI

2.73

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.78
Min
1.07

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SCI

7.43

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
5.06
Median
3.19
Q1
1.95
Min
0.95

SCI’s P/B Ratio of 7.43 is in the upper tier for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLUT vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFLUTSCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)123.1021.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.032.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.937.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)54.3518.40