FLUT vs. PSO: Flutter Entertainment vs. Pearson Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO) both fall under the Consumer Services industry group, but FLUT is classified in Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure while PSO is classified in Diversified Consumer Services.

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) trades as ordinary local shares, while Pearson (PSO) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Profile Item	FLUT	PSO
Name	Flutter Entertainment plc	Pearson plc Sponsored ADR
Country/Region	United States	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Services	Consumer Services
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Diversified Consumer Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Casinos & Gaming	Education Services
Market Capitalization	14.21 billion USD	10.38 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 4, 2002	November 18, 1996
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLUT

PSO

GSPC

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
Total Return (1Y)	-62.98%	34.42%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	-18.39%	15.38%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	-13.45%	17.99%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLUT

PSO

GSPC

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	49.93%	25.07%
Beta (5Y)	1.12	0.43
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-75.94%	-30.73%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.85M	698.84K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FLUT and PSO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-1.35	1.20
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-1.68	1.67

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative ROE of -13.47%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports 9.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

-13.47%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
FLUT: -13.47%
Min: -40.61%

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

9.16%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
PSO: 9.16%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their ROE against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative net margin of -5.37%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports 8.78%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

-5.37%

Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
FLUT: -5.37%
Min: -14.36%

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

8.78%

Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
PSO: 8.78%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) reports a negative operating margin of -8.21%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports 13.32%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

-8.21%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
FLUT: -8.21%
Min: -16.47%

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

13.32%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
PSO: 13.32%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
ROE (TTM)	-13.47%	9.16%
ROA (TTM)	-0.18%	5.09%
Net Margin (TTM)	-5.37%	8.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)	-8.21%	13.32%
Gross Margin (TTM)	41.63%	52.04%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 16.62% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Pearson (PSO) at 0.70% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Pearson (PSO) at -20.16% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at -829.17% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
Revenue Growth (YoY)	16.62%	0.70%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	20.08%	-2.35%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-829.17%	-20.16%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	--	15.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 0.91 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pearson (PSO) at 2.00 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.91

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
FLUT: 0.91
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

2.00

Max: 3.41
PSO: 2.00
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 1.56 and Pearson (PSO) at 0.52 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

1.56

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
FLUT: 1.56
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

0.52

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
PSO: 0.52
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.91	2.00
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.56	0.52
Net Debt / EBITDA	7.06	2.35

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports a yield of 1.46%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
FLUT: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

1.46%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
PSO: 1.46%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Pearson (PSO) reports a payout of 51.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.00%

Max: 89.80%
Q3: 36.83%
FLUT: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

51.09%

Max: 89.80%
PSO: 51.09%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	51.09%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Pearson (PSO) trades at 25.78 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) has no P/E ratio this period.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72
FLUT: --

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

25.78

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
PSO: 25.78
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): FLUT does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; PSO is benchmarked against the Consumer Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 0.82 and Pearson (PSO) at 2.86 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

0.82

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
FLUT: 0.82
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

2.86

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
PSO: 2.86
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) at 1.79 and Pearson (PSO) at 2.38 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

FLUT

Consumer Services industry group

1.79

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
FLUT: 1.79
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

PSO

Consumer Services industry group

2.38

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
PSO: 2.38
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs. Pearson (PSO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) and Pearson (PSO)
Metric	FLUT	PSO
P/E Ratio (TTM)	--	25.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.82	2.86
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	2.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	-7.47%	8.08%