Seek Returns

FLS vs. PH: Flowserve vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

How do Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) are both classified in the Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sub-industry within the broader Machinery industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile ItemFLSPH
NameFlowserve CorporationParker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
GICS Sub-IndustryIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & ComponentsIndustrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization10.19 billion USD115.73 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FLS
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
Total Return (1Y)24.11%14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.68%33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.48%25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FLS
PH
GSPC
Loading price history…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)42.18%27.33%
Beta (5Y)1.241.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.76%-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.61M627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FLS and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.470.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.700.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

11.61%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FLS
11.61%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max
40.55%
PH
24.95%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

5.42%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FLS
5.42%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max
27.47%
PH
16.62%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

13.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
FLS
13.45%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max
36.60%
PH
21.90%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
ROE (TTM)11.61%24.95%
ROA (TTM)6.36%8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)5.42%16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.45%21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)35.30%37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.76%8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.37%4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)23.36%5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)22.39%21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PH.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.10

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
FLS
2.10
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
Min
0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
PH
0.94
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

0.95

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
FLS
0.95
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
PH
1.09
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.100.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.951.09
Net Debt / EBITDA2.082.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

1.11%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FLS
1.11%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
PH
0.85%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 26.11% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

43.50%

Max
67.39%
FLS
43.50%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
PH
26.11%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.50%26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

40.19

Max
59.38
FLS
40.19
Q3
35.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
PH
31.53
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 sits in the pricier quartile — PH costs more per dollar of sales.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

2.17

Max
7.54
Q3
3.76
FLS
2.17
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max
7.54
PH
5.16
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

FLS

Capital Goods industry group

4.40

Max
9.66
Q3
5.00
FLS
4.40
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max
9.66
PH
7.25
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Flowserve (FLS) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Flowserve (FLS) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
MetricFLSPH
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.1931.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.175.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.407.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.62%2.45%