FLS vs. MAIR: Flowserve vs. Madison Air Stock Comparison
How do Flowserve (FLS) and Madison Air (MAIR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Flowserve (FLS) and Madison Air (MAIR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FLS is classified in Machinery while MAIR is classified in Building Products.
Flowserve (FLS) has been public since March 17, 1980, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Madison Air (MAIR) listed only on April 16, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.
| Profile Item | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Flowserve Corporation | Madison Air Solutions Corporation Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Building Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components | Building Products |
| Market Capitalization | 10.19 billion USD | 11.56 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | April 16, 2026 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.11% | -- |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.68% | -- |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.48% | -- |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.18% | 57.10% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.60 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.76% | -51.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.61M | 2.60M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Both FLS and MAIR need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.47 | -- |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.70 | -- |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Flowserve (FLS) earns 11.61% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Madison Air (MAIR) has no ROE this period.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
- MAIR
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% and Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.73% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
3.73%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- MAIR
- 3.73%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Madison Air (MAIR) at 19.76% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
19.76%
- Max
- 36.60%
- MAIR
- 19.76%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.61% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | 6.36% | -- |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.42% | 3.73% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.45% | 19.76% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 35.30% | 39.06% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Madison Air (MAIR) at 34.07% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MAIR.
EPS Growth
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% and Madison Air (MAIR) at -2.32% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.76% | 34.07% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.37% | -- |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 23.36% | -2.32% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.39% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 1.82 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
1.82
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- MAIR
- 1.82
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 0.87 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
0.87
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- MAIR
- 0.87
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.10 | 1.82 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.95 | 0.87 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 3.37 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- MAIR
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Madison Air (MAIR) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a payout of 43.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- MAIR
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 43.50% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Madison Air (MAIR) at 164.57 is richer still, above its industry range.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
164.57
- MAIR
- 164.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.09 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
3.09
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- MAIR
- 3.09
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 and Madison Air (MAIR) at 3.17 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
MAIR
Capital Goods industry group
3.17
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- MAIR
- 3.17
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLS | MAIR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.19 | 164.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.17 | 3.09 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.40 | 3.17 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.62% | -- |