FIX vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 6, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FIX and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FIX	PWR
Company Name	Comfort Systems USA, Inc.	Quanta Services, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	28.86 billion USD	62.76 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 27, 1997	February 12, 1998
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FIX and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FIX vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FIX	PWR
5-Day Price Return	2.02%	2.95%
13-Week Price Return	51.21%	8.97%
26-Week Price Return	153.78%	65.70%
52-Week Price Return	105.78%	40.82%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.87%	1.63%
Year-to-Date Return	92.90%	33.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.33M	0.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.38M	1.06M
3-Month Volatility	53.31%	25.03%
Beta	1.66	1.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FIX

39.33%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

FIX’s Return on Equity of 39.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FIX

9.01%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.01% places FIX in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FIX

12.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

An Operating Profit Margin of 12.21% places FIX in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FIX	PWR
Return on Equity (TTM)	39.33%	13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.76%	5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.01%	3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	12.21%	5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	22.50%	15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FIX

1.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

FIX’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FIX

0.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FIX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.04 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FIX

9.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

FIX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FIX	PWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.13	1.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.09	1.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.04	0.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.10	10.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

FIX vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FIX vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FIX

0.18%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

FIX’s Dividend Yield of 0.18% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FIX

7.68%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

FIX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.68% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FIX	PWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.18%	0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	7.68%	5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FIX

42.25

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

At 42.25, FIX’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PWR

63.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

At 63.96, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FIX

3.81

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.81, FIX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PWR

2.39

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.39 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FIX

9.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

At 9.60, FIX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FIX vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction & Engineering industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FIX	PWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	42.25	63.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.81	2.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	9.60	7.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	43.58	45.76