FIS vs. ICE: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but FIS is classified in Financial Services while ICE is classified in Capital Markets.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FIS.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 26.77%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FIS the richer one.

Both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 25.71% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 27.79% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for FIS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

On P/B ratio, both Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics