FIG vs. ZS: Figma vs. Zscaler Stock Comparison
How do Figma (FIG) and Zscaler (ZS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Figma (FIG) and Zscaler (ZS) both belong to the Software industry, though FIG is classified under Application Software while ZS falls under Systems Software.
Zscaler (ZS) has been public since March 16, 2018, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.
| Profile Item | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Figma Inc. Class A Common Stock | Zscaler Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | Systems Software |
| Market Capitalization | 10.08 billion USD | 32.23 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2025 | March 16, 2018 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -55.54% | -37.61% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 5.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | -10.75% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 76.91% | 68.66% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.88 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -86.20% | -76.41% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 13.00M | 2.92M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.78 | -0.61 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.11 | -0.79 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Figma (FIG) at -38.36% and Zscaler (ZS) at -2.87% report negative ROE values. Negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so both readings need extra context.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-38.36%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- FIG
- -38.36%
- Min
- -50.52%
ZS
Software & Services industry group
-2.87%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- ZS
- -2.87%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Figma (FIG) at -40.21% and Zscaler (ZS) at -1.89% report negative net margin values, usually indicating net losses over the period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-40.21%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
- FIG
- -40.21%
ZS
Software & Services industry group
-1.89%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- ZS
- -1.89%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Figma (FIG) at -30.45% and Zscaler (ZS) at -1.01% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-30.45%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- FIG
- -30.45%
- Min
- -30.45%
ZS
Software & Services industry group
-1.01%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- ZS
- -1.01%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -38.36% | -2.87% |
| ROA (TTM) | -15.53% | -1.03% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -40.21% | -1.89% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -30.45% | -1.01% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 81.38% | 76.87% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Figma (FIG) at 40.96% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Zscaler (ZS) at 25.42% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FIG.
EPS Growth
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Zscaler (ZS) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 40.96% | 25.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 27.51% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Figma (FIG) at 2.45 and Zscaler (ZS) at 1.70 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
2.45
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- FIG
- 2.45
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
ZS
Software & Services industry group
1.70
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- ZS
- 1.70
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Zscaler (ZS) at 0.72 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- FIG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
ZS
Software & Services industry group
0.72
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- ZS
- 0.72
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.45 | 1.70 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.07 | 0.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -36.63 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Zscaler (ZS) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ZS
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- ZS
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Zscaler (ZS) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ZS
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- ZS
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Zscaler (ZS) reports a P/E ratio value for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
- FIG
- --
ZS
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
- ZS
- --
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Figma (FIG) at 7.20 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Zscaler (ZS) at 9.61 sits in the pricier quartile — ZS costs more per dollar of sales.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
7.20
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FIG
- 7.20
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
ZS
Software & Services industry group
9.61
- Max
- 17.91
- ZS
- 9.61
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 6.52 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Zscaler (ZS) at 12.40 carries an above-peer premium to book — ZS is pricier on assets.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
6.52
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- FIG
- 6.52
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
ZS
Software & Services industry group
12.40
- Max
- 16.63
- ZS
- 12.40
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FIG | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 7.20 | 9.61 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.52 | 12.40 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.83% | 3.34% |