FIG vs. TWLO: Figma vs. Twilio Stock Comparison
How do Figma (FIG) and Twilio (TWLO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Figma (FIG) and Twilio (TWLO) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but FIG is classified in Software while TWLO is classified in IT Services.
Twilio (TWLO) has been public since June 23, 2016, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.
| Profile Item | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Figma Inc. Class A Common Stock | Twilio Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | IT Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | Internet Services & Infrastructure |
| Market Capitalization | 10.08 billion USD | 31.26 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2025 | June 23, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -55.54% | 61.15% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 54.31% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | -7.91% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 76.91% | 63.75% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -86.20% | -86.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 13.00M | 3.05M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.78 | 0.89 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.11 | 1.49 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative ROE of -38.36%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Twilio (TWLO) reports 14.92%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-38.36%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- FIG
- -38.36%
- Min
- -50.52%
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
14.92%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- TWLO
- 14.92%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Twilio (TWLO) reports 21.82%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-40.21%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
- FIG
- -40.21%
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 41.17%
- TWLO
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative operating margin of -30.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Twilio (TWLO) reports 9.53%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-30.45%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- FIG
- -30.45%
- Min
- -30.45%
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
9.53%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- TWLO
- 9.53%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -38.36% | 14.92% |
| ROA (TTM) | -15.53% | 2.69% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -40.21% | 21.82% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -30.45% | 9.53% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 81.38% | 48.61% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Figma (FIG) at 40.96% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Twilio (TWLO) at 13.66% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FIG.
EPS Growth
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Twilio (TWLO) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 40.96% | 13.66% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 9.82% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 2.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Twilio (TWLO) at 4.47 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
2.45
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- FIG
- 2.45
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
4.47
- Max
- 5.11
- TWLO
- 4.47
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Twilio (TWLO) at 0.12 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- FIG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
0.12
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- TWLO
- 0.12
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.45 | 4.47 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.07 | 0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -3.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Twilio (TWLO) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- TWLO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Twilio (TWLO) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- TWLO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Twilio (TWLO) trades at 25.38 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Figma (FIG) has no P/E ratio this period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
- FIG
- --
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
25.38
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- TWLO
- 25.38
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Figma (FIG) at 7.20 and Twilio (TWLO) at 5.36 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
7.20
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FIG
- 7.20
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
5.36
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- TWLO
- 5.36
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Figma (FIG) at 6.52 and Twilio (TWLO) at 3.41 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
6.52
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- FIG
- 6.52
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
TWLO
Software & Services industry group
3.41
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- TWLO
- 3.41
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 25.38 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 7.20 | 5.36 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.52 | 3.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.83% | 3.45% |