FIG vs. TEAM: Figma vs. Atlassian Stock Comparison
How do Figma (FIG) and Atlassian (TEAM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Figma (FIG) and Atlassian (TEAM) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Atlassian (TEAM) has been public since December 9, 2015, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.
| Profile Item | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Figma Inc. Class A Common Stock | Atlassian Corporation Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | Application Software |
| Market Capitalization | 10.08 billion USD | 38.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2025 | December 9, 2015 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -55.54% | -2.49% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | -3.42% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | -19.11% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 76.91% | 80.29% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.19 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -86.20% | -87.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 13.00M | 3.45M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.78 | -0.08 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.11 | -0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative ROE of -38.36%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Atlassian (TEAM) reports 7.75%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-38.36%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- FIG
- -38.36%
- Min
- -50.52%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
7.75%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- TEAM
- 7.75%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Atlassian (TEAM) reports 1.28%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-40.21%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
- FIG
- -40.21%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
1.28%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- TEAM
- 1.28%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative operating margin of -30.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Atlassian (TEAM) reports 10.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-30.45%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- FIG
- -30.45%
- Min
- -30.45%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
10.65%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- TEAM
- 10.65%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -38.36% | 7.75% |
| ROA (TTM) | -15.53% | 6.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -40.21% | 1.28% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -30.45% | 10.65% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 81.38% | 85.83% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Figma (FIG) at 40.96% and Atlassian (TEAM) at 26.02% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Atlassian (TEAM) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 40.96% | 26.02% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 22.97% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 2.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 0.72 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for TEAM.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
2.45
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- FIG
- 2.45
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
0.72
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- TEAM
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 1.35 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- FIG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
1.35
- Max
- 2.52
- TEAM
- 1.35
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.45 | 0.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.07 | 1.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | 0.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Atlassian (TEAM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- TEAM
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Atlassian (TEAM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- TEAM
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Atlassian (TEAM) trades at 465.70 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Figma (FIG) has no P/E ratio this period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
- FIG
- --
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
465.70
- TEAM
- 465.70
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Figma (FIG) at 7.20 and Atlassian (TEAM) at 5.63 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
7.20
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FIG
- 7.20
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
5.63
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- TEAM
- 5.63
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 6.52 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 42.54 prices above its benchmark range — TEAM looks rich relative to book.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
6.52
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- FIG
- 6.52
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
42.54
- TEAM
- 42.54
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FIG | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 465.70 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 7.20 | 5.63 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.52 | 42.54 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.83% | 5.17% |