FIG vs. QNT: Figma vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Figma (FIG) and Quantinuum (QNT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but FIG is classified in Software while QNT is classified in IT Services.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Figma (FIG) has a non-negative beta of 0.99.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FIG and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE value reported for this period; Figma (FIG) reports a negative figure of -38.36%, which needs context because negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity.

Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Quantinuum (QNT) reports 0.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Figma (FIG) at -30.45% and Quantinuum (QNT) at -6,939.56% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Figma (FIG) at 40.96% and Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Figma (FIG) at 2.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Figma (FIG) at 0.07 and Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Quantinuum (QNT) reports a P/E ratio value for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

Figma (FIG) at 7.20 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 clears its benchmark range — QNT looks notably rich on sales.

Figma (FIG) at 6.52 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 prices above its benchmark range — QNT looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics