FIG vs. NBIS: Figma vs. Nebius Stock Comparison
How do Figma (FIG) and Nebius (NBIS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Figma (FIG) and Nebius (NBIS) both belong to the Software industry, though FIG is classified under Application Software while NBIS falls under Systems Software.
| Profile Item | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Figma Inc. Class A Common Stock | Nebius Group N.V. Class A Ordinary Shares |
| Country/Region | United States | Netherlands |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | Systems Software |
| Market Capitalization | 10.08 billion USD | 35.20 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2025 | October 21, 2024 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -55.54% | 25.86% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | -- |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | -- |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Nebius (NBIS) carries a highly aggressive beta of 4.66, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Figma (FIG) is closer to market-like at 0.99 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 76.91% | 111.62% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 4.66 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -86.20% | -58.27% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 13.00M | 20.58M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.78 | 0.19 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -1.11 | 0.31 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative ROE of -38.36%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Nebius (NBIS) reports 0.60%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-38.36%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- FIG
- -38.36%
- Min
- -50.52%
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
0.60%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- NBIS
- 0.60%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Nebius (NBIS) reports 3.13%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-40.21%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
- FIG
- -40.21%
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
3.13%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- NBIS
- 3.13%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Figma (FIG) at -30.45% and Nebius (NBIS) at -0.22% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
-30.45%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- FIG
- -30.45%
- Min
- -30.45%
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
-0.22%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- NBIS
- -0.22%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | -38.36% | 0.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | -15.53% | -1.92% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | -40.21% | 3.13% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -30.45% | -0.22% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 81.38% | 74.26% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both companies are growing quickly, but Nebius (NBIS) at 479.02% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Figma (FIG) at 40.96% also sits in the top quartile.
EPS Growth
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Nebius (NBIS) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 40.96% | 479.02% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 239.83% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -28.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 2.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Nebius (NBIS) at 4.03 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
2.45
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- FIG
- 2.45
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
4.03
- Max
- 5.11
- NBIS
- 4.03
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Nebius (NBIS) at 0.99 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- FIG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
0.99
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- NBIS
- 0.99
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.45 | 4.03 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.07 | 0.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | 8.35 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Nebius (NBIS) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- NBIS
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Figma (FIG) nor Nebius (NBIS) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FIG
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- NBIS
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Nebius (NBIS) trades at 101.16 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Figma (FIG) has no P/E ratio this period.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
- FIG
- --
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
101.16
- Max
- 112.94
- NBIS
- 101.16
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Figma (FIG) at 7.20 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Nebius (NBIS) at 25.98 clears its benchmark range — NBIS looks notably rich on sales.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
7.20
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FIG
- 7.20
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
25.98
- NBIS
- 25.98
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Figma (FIG) at 6.52 and Nebius (NBIS) at 3.43 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FIG
Software & Services industry group
6.52
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- FIG
- 6.52
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
NBIS
Software & Services industry group
3.43
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- NBIS
- 3.43
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FIG | NBIS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -- | 101.16 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 7.20 | 25.98 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.52 | 3.43 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.83% | -27.31% |