FIG vs. MSTR: Figma vs. Strategy Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Figma (FIG) and Strategy (MSTR) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Strategy (MSTR) carries decades of public-market history since June 11, 1998, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the MSTR side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Strategy (MSTR) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.60, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Figma (FIG) is closer to market-like at 0.99 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Figma (FIG) at -38.36% and Strategy (MSTR) at -21.59% report negative ROE values. Negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so both readings need extra context.

Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Strategy (MSTR) reports 0.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Figma (FIG) at -30.45% and Strategy (MSTR) at -2.07% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Figma (FIG) at 40.96% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Strategy (MSTR) at 2.97% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Strategy (MSTR) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Figma (FIG) at 2.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Strategy (MSTR) at 4.04 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Strategy (MSTR) at 0.10 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Strategy (MSTR) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Strategy (MSTR) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Strategy (MSTR) reports a P/E ratio value for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

Figma (FIG) at 7.20 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Strategy (MSTR) at 110.23 clears its benchmark range — MSTR looks notably rich on sales.

Strategy (MSTR) at 0.98 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Figma (FIG) at 6.52 is valued near its industry’s middle — MSTR is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics