FIG vs. MANH: Figma vs. Manhattan Associates Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Figma (FIG) and Manhattan Associates (MANH) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Manhattan Associates (MANH) carries decades of public-market history since April 23, 1998, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the MANH side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Figma (FIG) is heavily traded at around 13.00M shares per day, whereas Manhattan Associates (MANH) sees a more moderate 751.46K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Figma (FIG) reports a negative ROE of -38.36%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Manhattan Associates (MANH) reports 83.51%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Manhattan Associates (MANH) reports 18.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Figma (FIG) reports a negative operating margin of -30.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Manhattan Associates (MANH) reports 26.45%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Figma (FIG) at 40.96% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Manhattan Associates (MANH) at 3.75% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Manhattan Associates (MANH) reports EPS growth of 2.56%, ranked against its industry; Figma (FIG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Figma (FIG) at 2.45 and Manhattan Associates (MANH) at 1.07 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Manhattan Associates (MANH) at 0.26 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Manhattan Associates (MANH) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Figma (FIG) nor Manhattan Associates (MANH) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Manhattan Associates (MANH) trades at 70.81 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Figma (FIG) has no P/E ratio this period.

Figma (FIG) at 7.20 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Manhattan Associates (MANH) at 12.69 sits in the pricier quartile — MANH costs more per dollar of sales.

Figma (FIG) at 6.52 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Manhattan Associates (MANH) at 73.12 prices above its benchmark range — MANH looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics