FICO vs. QNT: Fair Isaac vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Fair Isaac (FICO) and Quantinuum (QNT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but FICO is classified in Software while QNT is classified in IT Services.

Fair Isaac (FICO) has been public since July 22, 1987, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Quantinuum (QNT) listed only on June 4, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Fair Isaac (FICO) has a non-negative beta of 1.33.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FICO and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Neither Fair Isaac (FICO) nor Quantinuum (QNT) reports a ROE value for this period, so a direct comparison isn’t possible.

Fair Isaac (FICO) at 32.94% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.00%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative operating margin of -6,939.56%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Fair Isaac (FICO) reports 44.72%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Fair Isaac (FICO) at 27.33% and Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Only one side can be read here: Fair Isaac (FICO) reports EPS growth of 36.85%, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) at 0.99 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Quantinuum (QNT) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01 against its industry range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Fair Isaac (FICO) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Fair Isaac (FICO) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Fair Isaac (FICO) trades at 19.40 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantinuum (QNT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Fair Isaac (FICO) at 6.00 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 clears its benchmark range — QNT looks notably rich on sales.

Fair Isaac (FICO) reports a negative P/B ratio of -3.90, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Quantinuum (QNT) reports 64.89, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics