FFIV vs. IONQ: F5 vs. IonQ Stock Comparison

Company Profile

F5 (FFIV) and IonQ (IONQ) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but FFIV is classified in Communications Equipment while IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

F5 (FFIV) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 4, 1999, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas F5 (FFIV) is closer to market-like at 1.09 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

IonQ (IONQ) is heavily traded at around 22.02M shares per day, whereas F5 (FFIV) sees a more moderate 692.80K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both F5 (FFIV) at 19.01% and IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and F5 (FFIV) at 21.14% also retains a top-quartile share.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile F5 (FFIV) reports 23.99%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: IonQ (IONQ) reports revenue growth of 201.85%, ranked against its industry; F5 (FFIV) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Only one side can be read here: F5 (FFIV) reports EPS growth of 6.10%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

F5 (FFIV) at 1.73 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while F5 (FFIV) at 0.05 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither F5 (FFIV) nor IonQ (IONQ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither F5 (FFIV) nor IonQ (IONQ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while F5 (FFIV) at 24.83 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for IONQ, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

F5 (FFIV) at 5.17 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 clears its benchmark range — IONQ looks notably rich on sales.

On P/B ratio, both F5 (FFIV) at 4.41 and IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics