FER vs. RRX: Ferrovial vs. Regal Rexnord Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while RRX is classified in Electrical Equipment.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Profile Item	FER	RRX
Name	Ferrovial N.V.	Regal Rexnord Corporation
Country/Region	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Electrical Equipment
GICS Sub-Industry	Construction & Engineering	Electrical Components & Equipment
Market Capitalization	42.19 billion USD	11.26 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	August 13, 2012	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER

RRX

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
Total Return (1Y)	-1.10%	33.67%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	26.01%	20.16%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	17.20%	2.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER

RRX

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.38%	53.85%
Beta (5Y)	0.36	1.04
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-33.67%	-48.11%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.95M	1.21M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FER and RRX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.20	0.55
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.30	0.79

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 3.41% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FER: 11.62%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

3.41%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
RRX: 3.41%
Min: -17.12%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% and Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 3.77% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
FER: 6.15%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

3.77%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
RRX: 3.77%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% and Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 12.10% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
FER: 10.45%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

12.10%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
RRX: 12.10%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
ROE (TTM)	11.62%	3.41%
ROA (TTM)	2.62%	3.20%
Net Margin (TTM)	6.15%	3.77%
Operating Margin (TTM)	10.45%	12.10%
Gross Margin (TTM)	87.14%	37.24%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Regal Rexnord (RRX) at -1.65% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 42.86% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.24%	-1.65%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.43%	4.38%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-72.26%	42.86%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	70.54%	-16.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 2.22 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FER: 1.20
Min: 0.36

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

2.22

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
RRX: 2.22
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 0.67 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max: 2.33
FER: 1.44
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

0.67

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
RRX: 0.67
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	2.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.44	0.67
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.39	3.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% and Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 0.87% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FER: 0.94%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

0.87%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
RRX: 0.87%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and FER more so: Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 40.35% sits above the band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% exceeds every peer in its group.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER: 71.24%
Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

40.35%

Max: 67.39%
RRX: 40.35%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.94%	0.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	71.24%	40.35%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 48.72 sits in the richer quartile — RRX needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
FER: 32.26
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

48.72

Max: 59.38
RRX: 48.72
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 1.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max: 7.54
FER: 4.28
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

1.83

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
RRX: 1.83
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Regal Rexnord (RRX) at 1.64 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max: 9.66
FER: 6.59
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

RRX

Capital Goods industry group

1.64

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
RRX: 1.64
Min: -1.08

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Regal Rexnord (RRX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Regal Rexnord (RRX)
Metric	FER	RRX
P/E Ratio (TTM)	32.26	48.72
P/S Ratio (TTM)	4.28	1.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.59	1.64
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.11%	3.88%