FER vs. ROK: Ferrovial vs. Rockwell Automation Stock Comparison
How do Ferrovial (FER) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ferrovial (FER) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while ROK is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ferrovial N.V. | Rockwell Automation Inc. |
| Country/Region | Netherlands | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction & Engineering | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 42.19 billion USD | 41.82 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | August 13, 2012 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -1.10% | 6.19% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 26.01% | 16.94% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.20% | 4.86% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Rockwell Automation (ROK) has an aggressive beta of 1.54, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ferrovial (FER) is defensive at 0.36 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.38% | 34.28% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 1.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.67% | -45.09% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.95M | 799.28K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.20 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.30 | 0.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 38.73% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for ROK.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FER
- 11.62%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
38.73%
- Max
- 40.55%
- ROK
- 38.73%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 15.68% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.15%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FER
- 6.15%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
15.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- ROK
- 15.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 14.75% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
10.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- FER
- 10.45%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
14.75%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- ROK
- 14.75%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.62% | 38.73% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.62% | 9.32% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.15% | 15.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.45% | 14.75% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 87.14% | 48.95% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: Ferrovial (FER) reports revenue growth of 5.24%, ranked against its industry; Rockwell Automation (ROK) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 63.49% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.24% | -- |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.43% | -- |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -72.26% | 63.49% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 70.54% | 1.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 2.11 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FER
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
2.11
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- ROK
- 2.11
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 1.00 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 2.33
- FER
- 1.44
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- ROK
- 1.00
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 2.11 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.44 | 1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.39 | 1.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FER
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- ROK
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and FER more so: Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 51.03% sits above the band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% exceeds every peer in its group.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
71.24%
- FER
- 71.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
51.03%
- Max
- 67.39%
- ROK
- 51.03%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 71.24% | 51.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 29.97 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
32.26
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FER
- 32.26
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
29.97
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- ROK
- 29.97
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 4.65 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
4.28
- Max
- 7.54
- FER
- 4.28
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
4.65
- Max
- 7.54
- ROK
- 4.65
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 11.76 prices even higher, above its industry range.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.59
- Max
- 9.66
- FER
- 6.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
11.76
- ROK
- 11.76
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 32.26 | 29.97 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.28 | 4.65 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.59 | 11.76 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.11% | -1.13% |