FER vs. QXO: Ferrovial vs. QXO Stock Comparison
How do Ferrovial (FER) and QXO (QXO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Ferrovial (FER) and QXO (QXO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while QXO is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.
| Profile Item | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Ferrovial N.V. | QXO Inc. |
| Country/Region | Netherlands | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction & Engineering | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| Market Capitalization | 42.19 billion USD | 11.99 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | August 13, 2012 | April 17, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -1.10% | -19.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 26.01% | -16.39% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.20% | -17.91% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
QXO (QXO) has a highly aggressive beta of 2.28, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ferrovial (FER) is defensive at 0.36 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.38% | 68.10% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 2.28 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -33.67% | -95.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.95M | 19.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.20 | -0.34 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.30 | -0.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
QXO (QXO) reports a negative ROE of -4.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports 11.62%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FER
- 11.62%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
-4.60%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- QXO
- -4.60%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
QXO (QXO) reports a negative net margin of -5.17%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports 6.15%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.15%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FER
- 6.15%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
-5.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- QXO
- -5.17%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while QXO (QXO) at 1.29% operates in the bottom quartile.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
10.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- FER
- 10.45%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
1.29%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- QXO
- 1.29%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.62% | -4.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.62% | -0.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.15% | -5.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.45% | 1.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 87.14% | 24.54% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
QXO (QXO) at 11,924.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Neither side shows strong earnings momentum: Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% sits in the bottom EPS growth quartile, and QXO (QXO) at -672.73% is weaker still, below its industry range.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.24% | 11,924.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.43% | 433.80% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -72.26% | -672.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 70.54% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
QXO (QXO) at 4.12 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FER
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
4.12
- Max
- 5.22
- QXO
- 4.12
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
QXO (QXO) at 0.57 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 2.33
- FER
- 1.44
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.57
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- QXO
- 0.57
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 4.12 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.44 | 0.57 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.39 | 7.20 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FER
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- QXO
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
QXO (QXO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a payout of 71.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
71.24%
- FER
- 71.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- QXO
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 71.24% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Ferrovial (FER) trades at 32.26 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while QXO (QXO) has no P/E ratio this period.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
32.26
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FER
- 32.26
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
- QXO
- --
P/S Ratio (TTM)
QXO (QXO) at 1.21 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
4.28
- Max
- 7.54
- FER
- 4.28
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- QXO
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
QXO (QXO) at 0.90 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.59
- Max
- 9.66
- FER
- 6.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
QXO
Capital Goods industry group
0.90
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- QXO
- 0.90
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FER | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 32.26 | -- |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.28 | 1.21 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.59 | 0.90 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.11% | -21.23% |