FER vs. LII: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at FER and LII, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	FER	LII
Company Name	Ferrovial SE	Lennox International Inc.
Country	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Building Products
Market Capitalization	40.01 billion USD	20.69 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	August 13, 2012	July 29, 1999
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FER and LII by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FER vs. LII: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	FER	LII
5-Day Price Return	3.47%	-1.68%
13-Week Price Return	1.44%	-2.55%
26-Week Price Return	10.01%	-4.98%
52-Week Price Return	28.63%	1.89%
Month-to-Date Return	4.97%	-3.27%
Year-to-Date Return	16.08%	-3.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.53M	0.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.67M	0.39M
3-Month Volatility	13.03%	30.56%
Beta	0.91	1.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	FER	LII
Return on Equity (TTM)	56.21%	99.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)	12.11%	24.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	35.99%	15.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	34.91%	19.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	87.83%	33.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	FER	LII
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	1.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.86	0.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.95	1.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.20	26.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

FER vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FER vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FER

0.36%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LII

0.77%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	FER	LII
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.36%	0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	3.63%	19.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FER

10.03

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LII

25.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

LII’s P/E Ratio of 25.59 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FER

3.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.61, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LII

3.94

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.94 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FER vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	FER	LII
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.03	25.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.61	3.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.63	22.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	29.43	28.81