FER vs. HUBB: Ferrovial vs. Hubbell Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while HUBB is classified in Electrical Equipment.

Company profile comparison for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Profile Item	FER	HUBB
Name	Ferrovial N.V.	Hubbell Inc.
Country/Region	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Electrical Equipment
GICS Sub-Industry	Construction & Engineering	Electrical Components & Equipment
Market Capitalization	42.19 billion USD	22.69 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	August 13, 2012	June 5, 1972
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FER

HUBB

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
Total Return (1Y)	-1.10%	-2.60%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	26.01%	17.51%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	17.20%	18.15%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FER

HUBB

GSPC

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.38%	32.90%
Beta (5Y)	0.36	0.82
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-33.67%	-32.65%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.95M	557.78K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FER and HUBB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.20	-0.21
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.30	-0.28

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Hubbell (HUBB) at 23.43% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for HUBB.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FER: 11.62%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

23.43%

Max: 40.55%
HUBB: 23.43%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Hubbell (HUBB) at 13.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
FER: 6.15%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

13.78%

Max: 27.47%
HUBB: 13.78%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Hubbell (HUBB) at 20.52% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
FER: 10.45%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

20.52%

Max: 36.60%
HUBB: 20.52%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
ROE (TTM)	11.62%	23.43%
ROA (TTM)	2.62%	8.53%
Net Margin (TTM)	6.15%	13.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)	10.45%	20.52%
Gross Margin (TTM)	87.14%	35.02%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% and Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.84% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Hubbell (HUBB) at 15.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.24%	3.84%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	8.43%	5.71%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-72.26%	15.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	70.54%	20.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.53 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FER: 1.20
Min: 0.36

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

1.53

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
HUBB: 1.53
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 and Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.29 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max: 2.33
FER: 1.44
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

1.29

Max: 2.33
HUBB: 1.29
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	1.53
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.44	1.29
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.39	3.09

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.36% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, HUBB the richer one.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FER: 0.94%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

1.36%

Max: 2.66%
HUBB: 1.36%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and FER more so: Hubbell (HUBB) at 33.31% sits above the band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% exceeds every peer in its group.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER: 71.24%
Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

33.31%

Max: 67.39%
HUBB: 33.31%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.94%	1.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	71.24%	33.31%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 and Hubbell (HUBB) at 25.19 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
FER: 32.26
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

25.19

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
HUBB: 25.19
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.44 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max: 7.54
FER: 4.28
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

3.44

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
HUBB: 3.44
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 and Hubbell (HUBB) at 5.53 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max: 9.66
FER: 6.59
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

HUBB

Capital Goods industry group

5.53

Max: 9.66
HUBB: 5.53
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Ferrovial (FER) vs. Hubbell (HUBB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Ferrovial (FER) and Hubbell (HUBB)
Metric	FER	HUBB
P/E Ratio (TTM)	32.26	25.19
P/S Ratio (TTM)	4.28	3.44
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.59	5.53
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.11%	2.44%