FER vs. HONA: Ferrovial vs. Honeywell Aerospace Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ferrovial (FER) and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but FER is classified in Construction & Engineering while HONA is classified in Aerospace & Defense.

Ferrovial (FER) has been public since August 13, 2012 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) only listed on June 15, 2026 — long-window metrics on the HONA side should be interpreted with caution.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative beta of -5.78, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Ferrovial (FER) has a non-negative beta of 0.36.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both FER and HONA need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Ferrovial (FER) earns 11.62% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) has no ROE this period.

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 11.25% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 12.68% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% and Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at -36.80% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Ferrovial (FER) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.44 against its industry range, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a yield of 0.94%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports a payout of 71.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 43.32 sits in the richer quartile — HONA needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) at 2.69 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.

Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) reports a negative P/B ratio of -18.85, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Ferrovial (FER) reports 6.59, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics