FDS vs. SYF: FactSet Research Systems vs. Synchrony Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) and Synchrony Financial (SYF) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but FDS is classified in Capital Markets while SYF is classified in Consumer Finance.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Synchrony Financial (SYF) has an aggressive beta of 1.40, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) is defensive at 0.69 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 25.48% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 19.83% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FDS.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 34.07% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 21.54%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.22% and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 49.84% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 6.65% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Synchrony Financial (SYF) at -0.50% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at -6.30% and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 8.54% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and Synchrony Financial (SYF) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: FactSet Research Systems (FDS) in Financial Services and Synchrony Financial (SYF) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 1.33% and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 1.67% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 31.02% and Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 12.94% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 7.70 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 22.50 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for SYF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 2.45 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 4.67 sits in the pricier quartile — FDS costs more per dollar of sales.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 1.55 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while FactSet Research Systems (FDS) at 5.77 carries an above-peer premium to book — FDS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics