Seek Returns

FANG vs. WMB: Diamondback Energy vs. Williams Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while WMB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
Profile ItemFANGWMB
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.The Williams Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD80.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
Total Return (1Y)26.99%14.81%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%28.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%23.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%26.38%
Beta (5Y)0.530.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-23.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M7.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and WMB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.670.40
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.970.56

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Williams (WMB) at 18.31% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WMB

Energy industry group

18.31%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
WMB
18.31%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WMB

Energy industry group

24.66%

Max
56.92%
WMB
24.66%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Williams (WMB) at 32.69%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WMB

Energy industry group

32.69%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WMB
32.69%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
ROE (TTM)4.86%18.31%
ROA (TTM)2.07%4.59%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%24.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%32.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%63.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 13.78% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Williams (WMB) at 17.58% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%13.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%2.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%17.58%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%8.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 and Williams (WMB) at 0.75 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

WMB

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
WMB
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

1.58

Max
1.75
WMB
1.58
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.550.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.291.58
Net Debt / EBITDA0.994.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

3.23%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
WMB
3.23%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% and Williams (WMB) at 81.69% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

81.69%

Max
133.24%
WMB
81.69%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%81.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 and Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WMB

Energy industry group

25.23

Max
39.54
WMB
25.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 6.32 clears its benchmark range — WMB looks notably rich on sales.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

6.32

WMB
6.32
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 5.11 prices above its benchmark range — WMB looks rich relative to book.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WMB

Energy industry group

5.11

WMB
5.11
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Williams (WMB)
MetricFANGWMB
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0925.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.836.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.285.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%-3.56%