FANG vs. VNOM: Diamondback Energy vs. Viper Energy Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Viper Energy (VNOM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Viper Energy (VNOM) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | Viper Energy, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 21.21 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | June 18, 2014 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 12.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 17.78% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 18.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 29.71% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -34.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 1.93M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | 0.29 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | 0.40 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 5.60% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VNOM
Energy industry group
5.60%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- VNOM
- 5.60%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 12.77% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VNOM
Energy industry group
12.77%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- VNOM
- 12.77%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 58.79% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VNOM
Energy industry group
58.79%
- Max
- 71.31%
- VNOM
- 58.79%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 5.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 5.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 12.77% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 58.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 100.00% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both companies are growing quickly, but Viper Energy (VNOM) at 62.09% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% also sits in the top quartile.
EPS Growth
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% and Viper Energy (VNOM) at -112.57% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | 62.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | 17.21% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | -112.57% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 5.92 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
VNOM
Energy industry group
5.92
- VNOM
- 5.92
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 0.23 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
VNOM
Energy industry group
0.23
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- VNOM
- 0.23
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 5.92 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 1.14 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Viper Energy (VNOM) at 5.97% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, VNOM the richer one.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VNOM
Energy industry group
5.97%
- Max
- 8.57%
- VNOM
- 5.97%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Viper Energy (VNOM) reports payout ratio above 100% at 194.44%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports 57.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VNOM
Energy industry group
194.44%
- VNOM
- 194.44%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 5.97% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 194.44% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 32.24 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VNOM
Energy industry group
32.24
- Max
- 39.54
- VNOM
- 32.24
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Viper Energy (VNOM) at 9.82 clears its benchmark range — VNOM looks notably rich on sales.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
VNOM
Energy industry group
9.82
- VNOM
- 9.82
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 and Viper Energy (VNOM) at 1.53 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VNOM
Energy industry group
1.53
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- VNOM
- 1.53
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 32.24 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 9.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 1.53 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 3.67% |